порівняння: Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Проти. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Проти. Falken Azenis FK510 Проти. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro премія

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 премія

3. Falken Azenis FK510 вище середнього

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ бюджетний

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 173

2. Falken Azenis FK510 125

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 102

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 82

1. Falken Azenis FK510 29x

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 15x

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 12x

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 5x

1. Falken Azenis FK510 1.

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 1.

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2.

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 7.

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 6.

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 9.

3. Falken Azenis FK510 15.

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 39.

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 2.33

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 5.17

3. Falken Azenis FK510 5.45

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 17.6

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2025

2. Falken Azenis FK510 2022

3. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 2022

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 2021

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro зразковий

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 зразковий

3. Falken Azenis FK510 зразковий

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ досить

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 добре

2. Falken Azenis FK510 рекомендовані

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro умовно рекомендовані

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ досить

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

89%

Vredestein
Quatrac Pro

82%

Falken
Azenis FK510

80%

Nankang
Sportnex AS-2+

78%

1. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 97%

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 90%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 75%

4. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 65%

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 89%

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 88%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 87%

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 68%

1. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 99%

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 86%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 79%

4. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 61%

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 92%

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 86%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 83%

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 76%

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 100%

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 85%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 67%

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 47%

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 A

2. Falken Azenis FK510 A

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro ?

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ ?

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

89%

Vredestein
Quatrac Pro

77%

Falken
Azenis FK510

70%

Nankang
Sportnex AS-2+

63%

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 90%

2. Falken Azenis FK510 80%

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 71%

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 57%

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 90%

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 86%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 75%

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 70%

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 94%

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 92%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 70%

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 66%

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 87%

2. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 65%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 55%

4. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 53%

Nankang
Sportnex AS-2+

91%

Vredestein
Quatrac Pro

83%

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

78%

Falken
Azenis FK510

74%

1. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 100%

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 84%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 76%

4. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 75%

1. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 100%

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 80%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 75%

4. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 73%

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 90%

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 78%

3. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 73%

4. Falken Azenis FK510 73%

1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 70 dB

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro ?

4. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ ?

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

66%

Falken
Azenis FK510

64%

Nankang
Sportnex AS-2+

63%

Vredestein
Quatrac Pro

61%

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 66%

2. Falken Azenis FK510 64%

3. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ 63%

4. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 61%

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 C

2. Falken Azenis FK510 E

3. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ ?

4. Vredestein Quatrac Pro ?