порівняння: Continental PremiumContact 7 Проти. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Проти. Vredestein ULTRAC Проти. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 премія

2. Vredestein ULTRAC премія

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 вище середнього

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun вище середнього

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 81

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 66

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 23x

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 16x

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 2.

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 8.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 20.

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2.35

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2026

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun зразковий

2. Vredestein ULTRAC настійно рекомендується

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 переможець тестування

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добре

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 добре

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добре

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun все ще рекомендується

4. Vredestein ULTRAC досить

Vredestein
ULTRAC

85%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

83%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

71%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 97%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 70%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 68%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 66%

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 95%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 76%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 71%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 95%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 81%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 78%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 59%

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 98%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 88%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 61%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 59%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 82%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 65%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun B

4. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

Continental
PremiumContact 7

94%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

86%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

84%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

76%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 90%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 88%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 75%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 97%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 81%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 81%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 78%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

75%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

67%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

40%

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 75%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 69%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 65%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 56%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 83%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 81%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 59%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 24%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 C

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun E

4. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

Continental
PremiumContact 7

83%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

80%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

61%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 82%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 63%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 76%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 75%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 68%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 ?

2. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun ? dB