порівняння: Semperit Speed-Life 2 Проти. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Проти. Firestone Roadhawk Проти. Continental EcoContact 6

1. Continental EcoContact 6 премія

2. Firestone Roadhawk вище середнього

3. Semperit Speed-Life 2 бюджетний

4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 бюджетний

1. Continental EcoContact 6 676

2. Firestone Roadhawk 161

3. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 124

4. Semperit Speed-Life 2 82

1. Firestone Roadhawk 21x

2. Semperit Speed-Life 2 7x

3. Continental EcoContact 6 5x

4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 5x

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2.

2. Semperit Speed-Life 2 3.

3. Continental EcoContact 6 7.

4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 12.

1. Continental EcoContact 6 23.

2. Semperit Speed-Life 2 30.

3. Firestone Roadhawk 31.

4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 39.

1. Firestone Roadhawk 11.9

2. Continental EcoContact 6 13

3. Semperit Speed-Life 2 13.71

4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 22.4

1. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 2025

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2023

3. Continental EcoContact 6 2022

4. Semperit Speed-Life 2 2020

1. Firestone Roadhawk зразковий

2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 задовільно

3. Continental EcoContact 6 задовільно

4. Semperit Speed-Life 2 задовільно

1. Continental EcoContact 6 задовільно

2. Semperit Speed-Life 2 задовільно

3. Firestone Roadhawk умовно рекомендовані

4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 досить

Firestone
Roadhawk

72%

Laufenn
S Fit EQ+ LK01

67%

Semperit
Speed-Life 2

65%

Continental
EcoContact 6

59%

1. Semperit Speed-Life 2 85%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

3. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 58%

4. Continental EcoContact 6 40%

1. Semperit Speed-Life 2 88%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 79%

3. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 73%

4. Continental EcoContact 6 61%

1. Semperit Speed-Life 2 73%

2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 73%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 67%

4. Continental EcoContact 6 66%

1. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 84%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 78%

3. Continental EcoContact 6 69%

4. Semperit Speed-Life 2 40%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

2. Semperit Speed-Life 2 65%

3. Continental EcoContact 6 57%

4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 33%

1. Firestone Roadhawk A

2. Continental EcoContact 6 B

3. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 B

4. Semperit Speed-Life 2 C

Firestone
Roadhawk

82%

Laufenn
S Fit EQ+ LK01

79%

Continental
EcoContact 6

74%

Semperit
Speed-Life 2

70%

1. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 89%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 83%

3. Semperit Speed-Life 2 78%

4. Continental EcoContact 6 78%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 75%

2. Continental EcoContact 6 73%

3. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 63%

4. Semperit Speed-Life 2 60%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 88%

2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 85%

3. Semperit Speed-Life 2 73%

4. Continental EcoContact 6 70%

Semperit
Speed-Life 2

85%

Continental
EcoContact 6

85%

Laufenn
S Fit EQ+ LK01

83%

Firestone
Roadhawk

62%

1. Semperit Speed-Life 2 85%

2. Continental EcoContact 6 85%

3. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 83%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 62%

1. Semperit Speed-Life 2 ?

2. Continental EcoContact 6 ?

3. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 ?

4. Firestone Roadhawk ?

Semperit
Speed-Life 2

100%

Continental
EcoContact 6

100%

Firestone
Roadhawk

74%

Laufenn
S Fit EQ+ LK01

74.7%

1. Semperit Speed-Life 2 100%

2. Continental EcoContact 6 100%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 0%

1. Continental EcoContact 6 A

2. Semperit Speed-Life 2 C

3. Firestone Roadhawk C

4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 C