порівняння: Continental WinterContact TS 870 Проти. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Проти. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 премія

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 вище середнього

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ вище середнього

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 відмінно

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 відмінно

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ добре

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 добре

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ добре

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 добре

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

87%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

80.6%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 84%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

81%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

79.2%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

77.8%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 74%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

72%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 73%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

84%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

70.9%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

64%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 60%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

78%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%