порівняння: Continental PremiumContact 5 Проти. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Проти. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Проти. Kumho Ecsta HS52

1. Continental PremiumContact 5 премія

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 премія

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 премія

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 вище середнього

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Continental PremiumContact 5 74

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

4. Continental PremiumContact 5 2x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. Continental PremiumContact 5 5.

1. Continental PremiumContact 5 7.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

3. Continental PremiumContact 5 6

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

4. Continental PremiumContact 5 2021

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 зразковий

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 зразковий

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добре

4. Continental PremiumContact 5 рекомендовані

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 добре

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 задовільно

3. Continental PremiumContact 5 рекомендовані

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 рекомендовані

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

71%

Continental
PremiumContact 5

66%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 76%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

4. Continental PremiumContact 5 55%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

2. Continental PremiumContact 5 70%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 59%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 77%

3. Continental PremiumContact 5 75%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 71%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

4. Continental PremiumContact 5 67%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 A

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

4. Continental PremiumContact 5 A

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

81%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

Continental
PremiumContact 5

71%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 83%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

4. Continental PremiumContact 5 50%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 79%

3. Continental PremiumContact 5 72%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Continental
PremiumContact 5

71%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

70%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 75%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

4. Continental PremiumContact 5 67%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 90%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 76%

3. Continental PremiumContact 5 75%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 66%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

3. Continental PremiumContact 5 ?

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

70%

Continental
PremiumContact 5

63%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 78%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

4. Continental PremiumContact 5 63%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 C

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. Continental PremiumContact 5 C