порівняння: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Проти. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Проти. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Проти. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 премія

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 премія

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 вище середнього

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ вище середнього

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 відмінно

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 відмінно

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 відмінно

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ добре

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 добре

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ добре

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 добре

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 умовно рекомендовані

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

94%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

87%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

80.6%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 97%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 100%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 100%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 74%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

90%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

90%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

77.8%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 96%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 97%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 95%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 60%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

93%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

89%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

79.2%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 96%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 88%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 71%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 95%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 96%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 96%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

90%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

89%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

72%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 82%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 98%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 97%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

70.9%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

66%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

64%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 53%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 71%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 54%

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

71%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

0%