порівняння: Barum Bravuris 5 HM Проти. Semperit Speed-Life 2 Проти. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Проти. Firestone Roadhawk Проти. Continental EcoContact 6

1. Continental EcoContact 6 премія

2. Firestone Roadhawk вище середнього

3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM бюджетний

4. Semperit Speed-Life 2 бюджетний

5. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 бюджетний

1. Continental EcoContact 6 676

2. Firestone Roadhawk 161

3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 161

4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 124

5. Semperit Speed-Life 2 82

1. Firestone Roadhawk 21x

2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 8x

3. Semperit Speed-Life 2 7x

4. Continental EcoContact 6 5x

5. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 5x

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2.

2. Semperit Speed-Life 2 3.

3. Continental EcoContact 6 7.

4. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 8.

5. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 12.

1. Continental EcoContact 6 23.

2. Semperit Speed-Life 2 30.

3. Firestone Roadhawk 31.

4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 39.

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 46.

1. Firestone Roadhawk 11.9

2. Continental EcoContact 6 13

3. Semperit Speed-Life 2 13.71

4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 22.4

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.38

1. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 2025

2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 2023

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2023

4. Continental EcoContact 6 2022

5. Semperit Speed-Life 2 2020

1. Firestone Roadhawk зразковий

2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM добре

3. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 задовільно

4. Continental EcoContact 6 задовільно

5. Semperit Speed-Life 2 задовільно

1. Continental EcoContact 6 задовільно

2. Semperit Speed-Life 2 задовільно

3. Firestone Roadhawk умовно рекомендовані

4. Barum Bravuris 5 HM умовно рекомендовані

5. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 досить

Firestone
Roadhawk

71%

Semperit
Speed-Life 2

70%

Laufenn
S Fit EQ+ LK01

63%

Barum
Bravuris 5 HM

60%

Continental
EcoContact 6

56%

1. Semperit Speed-Life 2 85%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 64%

4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 58%

5. Continental EcoContact 6 40%

1. Semperit Speed-Life 2 88%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 79%

3. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 73%

4. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 69%

5. Continental EcoContact 6 61%

1. Semperit Speed-Life 2 73%

2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 73%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 67%

4. Continental EcoContact 6 66%

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 61%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

2. Semperit Speed-Life 2 65%

3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 58%

4. Continental EcoContact 6 57%

5. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 33%

1. Firestone Roadhawk A

2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM B

3. Continental EcoContact 6 B

4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 B

5. Semperit Speed-Life 2 C

Laufenn
S Fit EQ+ LK01

90%

Firestone
Roadhawk

84%

Semperit
Speed-Life 2

76%

Continental
EcoContact 6

74%

Barum
Bravuris 5 HM

61%

1. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 89%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 83%

3. Semperit Speed-Life 2 78%

4. Continental EcoContact 6 78%

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 57%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 88%

2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 85%

3. Semperit Speed-Life 2 73%

4. Continental EcoContact 6 70%

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 68%

Semperit
Speed-Life 2

100%

Continental
EcoContact 6

94%

Barum
Bravuris 5 HM

81%

Laufenn
S Fit EQ+ LK01

72%

Firestone
Roadhawk

69%

1. Continental EcoContact 6 89%

2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 72%

3. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 72%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 64%

5. Semperit Speed-Life 2 0%

1. Semperit Speed-Life 2 100%

2. Continental EcoContact 6 100%

3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 90%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

5. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 0%

1. Continental EcoContact 6 A

2. Semperit Speed-Life 2 C

3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM C

4. Firestone Roadhawk C

5. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 C

Continental
EcoContact 6

85%

Semperit
Speed-Life 2

85%

Laufenn
S Fit EQ+ LK01

83%

Firestone
Roadhawk

62%

Barum
Bravuris 5 HM

61%

1. Semperit Speed-Life 2 85%

2. Continental EcoContact 6 85%

3. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 83%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 62%

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 61%

1. Semperit Speed-Life 2 ?

2. Continental EcoContact 6 ?

3. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 ?

4. Firestone Roadhawk ?

5. Barum Bravuris 5 HM ?