порівняння: Petlas Imperium PT515 Проти. Firestone Roadhawk Проти. Michelin e.Primacy Проти. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Проти. Continental PremiumContact 7 Проти. Hankook Ventus Evo

Budget

Petlas

Imperium PT515

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test profile

Imperium PT515

Roadhawk

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

Ventus Evo

Кількість тестів

5

21

4

3

26

3

Best position

#13

#2

#3

#2

#1

#2

Average position

24.0

11.9

12.0

3.3

2.2

3.3

Latest test

2024

2025

2026

Available sizes

11

164

111

40

66

60

мокрий

Petlas Imperium PT515

54%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

гальмування на мокрій дорозі

Petlas Imperium PT515

55%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

аквапланеризм - крос

Petlas Imperium PT515

66%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

аквапланування - поздовжнє

Petlas Imperium PT515

71%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

мокрий круговий поворот

Petlas Imperium PT515

60%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

вологе прибирання

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

сухий

Petlas Imperium PT515

46%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

сухе гальмування

Petlas Imperium PT515

63%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

поведінка на сухій дорозі

Petlas Imperium PT515

51%

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

суха обробка

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

комфорт

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

зовнішній шум

Petlas Imperium PT515

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

внутрішній шум

Petlas Imperium PT515

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

88%

витрати

Petlas Imperium PT515

72%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

паливна ефективність

Petlas Imperium PT515

65%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

пробіг

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

розміри та ціни

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

порівняння: Petlas Imperium PT515 Проти. Firestone Roadhawk Проти. Michelin e.Primacy Проти. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Проти. Continental PremiumContact 7 Проти. Hankook Ventus Evo

Imperium PT515

Roadhawk

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

Ventus Evo

Test profile

мокрий

сухий

комфорт

витрати

розміри та ціни

додати до порівняння