0 shops · 0+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Michelin Energy Saver + (2026)

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Compact
Michelin
Energy Saver +
Number of tests
1
4
Best position
#10
#5
Average position
10.0
10.3
Latest test
2018
2018
Available sizes
42
83

These tyres were not tested together. the comparison below is inferred from separate tests by normalizing both tyres against 4 shared benchmark tyres, so treat it as an estimate.

Dry
Confidence
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
100%
Michelin Energy Saver +
100%
Dry driving behavior
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
100%
Michelin Energy Saver +
100%
Safety
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
99%
Michelin Energy Saver +
100%
Wet
Confidence
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
95%
Michelin Energy Saver +
100%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
97%
Michelin Energy Saver +
100%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
100%
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
95%
Michelin Energy Saver +
100%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
70%
Michelin Energy Saver +
100%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
78%
Michelin Energy Saver +
100%
Comfort
Confidence
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
100%
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
79%
Michelin Energy Saver +
100%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
100%
Michelin Energy Saver +
72%
Costs
Confidence
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
88%
Michelin Energy Saver +
100%
Fuel efficiency
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
87%
Michelin Energy Saver +
100%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
89%
Michelin Energy Saver +
100%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Dimension Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact Michelin Energy Saver + %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison