порівняння: Firestone Roadhawk Проти. Semperit Speed-Life 3 Проти. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Проти. Hankook ION Evo Проти. Falken e.Ziex

вище середнього

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Roadhawk

Speed-Life 3

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Кількість тестів

21

14

3

1

3

Best position

#2

#1

#2

Average position

11.9

18.1

3.3

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

164

116

40

64

34

мокрий

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

аквапланеризм - крос

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

аквапланування - поздовжнє

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

гальмування на мокрій дорозі

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

вологе прибирання

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

мокрий круговий поворот

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Мокрий бік керівництва

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

сухий

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

сухе гальмування

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

суха обробка

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

поведінка на сухій дорозі

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

комфорт

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

зовнішній шум

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

внутрішній шум

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

комфорт

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

витрати

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

опір коченню

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

пробіг

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

ціна/вартість

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

81%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

паливна ефективність

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Semperit Speed-Life 3

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

розміри та ціни

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

порівняння: Firestone Roadhawk Проти. Semperit Speed-Life 3 Проти. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Проти. Hankook ION Evo Проти. Falken e.Ziex

Roadhawk

Speed-Life 3

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test profile

мокрий

сухий

комфорт

витрати

розміри та ціни

додати до порівняння