порівняння: Firestone Roadhawk Проти. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Проти. BFGoodrich Advantage Проти. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

вище середнього

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test profile

Roadhawk

Ecsta HS52

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Кількість тестів

21

10

14

3

Best position

#2

#8

#2

Average position

11.9

6.0

13.4

3.3

Latest test

2024

2026

Available sizes

164

104

153

40

мокрий

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

аквапланеризм - крос

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

аквапланування - поздовжнє

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

гальмування на мокрій дорозі

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

вологе прибирання

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

мокрий круговий поворот

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Мокрий бік керівництва

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

мокра ефективність

Firestone Roadhawk

24%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

55%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

сухий

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

сухе гальмування

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

суха обробка

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

поведінка на сухій дорозі

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

суха ефективність

Firestone Roadhawk

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

комфорт

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

зовнішній шум

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

комфорт

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

внутрішній шум

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

витрати

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

пробіг

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

опір коченню

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

ціна/вартість

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

паливна ефективність

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

розміри та ціни

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

порівняння: Firestone Roadhawk Проти. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Проти. BFGoodrich Advantage Проти. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Roadhawk

Ecsta HS52

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

мокрий

сухий

комфорт

витрати

розміри та ціни

додати до порівняння