порівняння: Firestone Roadhawk Проти. Hankook ION Evo Проти. Falken e.Ziex Проти. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Проти. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

вище середнього

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

Roadhawk

ION Evo

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance+

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Кількість тестів

21

1

3

23

5

Best position

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

11.9

1.0

3.7

3.3

2.2

Latest test

2024

2025

Available sizes

164

64

34

176

63

мокрий

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

аквапланеризм - крос

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

аквапланування - поздовжнє

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

вологе прибирання

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

гальмування на мокрій дорозі

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

мокрий круговий поворот

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

сухий

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

сухе гальмування

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

суха обробка

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

суха реакція рульового управління

Firestone Roadhawk

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

комфорт

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

зовнішній шум

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

комфорт

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

внутрішній шум

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

витрати

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

пробіг

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

опір коченню

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

ціна/вартість

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

розміри та ціни

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

порівняння: Firestone Roadhawk Проти. Hankook ION Evo Проти. Falken e.Ziex Проти. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Проти. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Roadhawk

ION Evo

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance+

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test profile

мокрий

сухий

комфорт

витрати

розміри та ціни

додати до порівняння