порівняння: Firestone Roadhawk Проти. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Проти. Falken e.Ziex Проти. Continental PremiumContact 7 Проти. Hankook Ventus Evo

вище середнього

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test profile

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

Ventus Evo

Кількість тестів

21

5

3

26

3

Best position

#2

#1

#2

#1

#2

Average position

11.9

2.2

3.7

2.2

3.3

Latest test

2024

2025

2026

Available sizes

164

63

34

66

60

мокрий

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

аквапланеризм - крос

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

аквапланування - поздовжнє

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

гальмування на мокрій дорозі

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

вологе прибирання

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

мокрий круговий поворот

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

сухий

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

сухе гальмування

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

суха обробка

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

комфорт

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

зовнішній шум

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

внутрішній шум

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Continental PremiumContact 7

88%

комфорт

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

витрати

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

опір коченню

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

пробіг

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

ціна/вартість

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

розміри та ціни

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

порівняння: Firestone Roadhawk Проти. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Проти. Falken e.Ziex Проти. Continental PremiumContact 7 Проти. Hankook Ventus Evo

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

Ventus Evo

Test profile

мокрий

сухий

комфорт

витрати

розміри та ціни

додати до порівняння