порівняння: Firestone Roadhawk Проти. BFGoodrich Advantage Проти. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Проти. Falken e.Ziex Проти. Hankook Ventus Evo

вище середнього

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Roadhawk

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Кількість тестів

21

14

3

Best position

#2

#8

#2

Average position

11.9

13.4

3.3

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2024

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

164

153

40

34

60

мокрий

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

аквапланеризм - крос

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

аквапланування - поздовжнє

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

гальмування на мокрій дорозі

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

вологе прибирання

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

мокрий круговий поворот

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Мокрий бік керівництва

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

сухий

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

сухе гальмування

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

суха обробка

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

поведінка на сухій дорозі

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

комфорт

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

зовнішній шум

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

внутрішній шум

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

комфорт

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

витрати

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

пробіг

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

опір коченню

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

ціна/вартість

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

розміри та ціни

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

порівняння: Firestone Roadhawk Проти. BFGoodrich Advantage Проти. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Проти. Falken e.Ziex Проти. Hankook Ventus Evo

Roadhawk

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Test profile

мокрий

сухий

комфорт

витрати

розміри та ціни

додати до порівняння