порівняння: Firestone Multiseason 2 Проти. Viking Fourtech Проти. Viking WinTech Проти. Hankook Ventus Evo Проти. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

вище середнього

Firestone

Multiseason 2

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

Ventus Evo

Test profile

Multiseason 2

Fourtech

WinTech

Ventus Evo

UltraGrip Performance 3

Кількість тестів

13

5

6

3

24

Best position

#6

#11

#2

#1

Average position

10.9

17.0

20.8

3.3

2.7

Latest test

2025

2021

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

61

32

59

60

302

мокрий

Firestone Multiseason 2

68%

Viking Fourtech

70%

Viking WinTech

55%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

вологе прибирання

Firestone Multiseason 2

66%

Viking Fourtech

59%

Viking WinTech

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

аквапланування - поздовжнє

Firestone Multiseason 2

64%

Viking Fourtech

77%

Viking WinTech

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

гальмування на мокрій дорозі

Firestone Multiseason 2

77%

Viking Fourtech

71%

Viking WinTech

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

мокрий круговий поворот

Firestone Multiseason 2

75%

Viking Fourtech

55%

Viking WinTech

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

86%

аквапланеризм - крос

Firestone Multiseason 2

48%

Viking Fourtech

96%

Viking WinTech

46%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

сніг

Firestone Multiseason 2

80%

Viking Fourtech

71%

Viking WinTech

62%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Керування на снігу

Firestone Multiseason 2

80%

Viking Fourtech

71%

Viking WinTech

47%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

62%

Зчеплення на снігу

Firestone Multiseason 2

87%

Viking Fourtech

51%

Viking WinTech

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Гальмування на снігу

Firestone Multiseason 2

86%

Viking Fourtech

82%

Viking WinTech

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Проходження поворотів на снігу

Firestone Multiseason 2

60%

Viking Fourtech

67%

Viking WinTech

65%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

витрати

Firestone Multiseason 2

75%

Viking Fourtech

84%

Viking WinTech

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

опір коченню

Firestone Multiseason 2

79%

Viking Fourtech

96%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

ціна/вартість

Firestone Multiseason 2

71%

Viking Fourtech

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

68%

пробіг

Firestone Multiseason 2

71%

Viking Fourtech

65%

Viking WinTech

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

комфорт

Firestone Multiseason 2

73%

Viking Fourtech

76%

Viking WinTech

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

зовнішній шум

Firestone Multiseason 2

76%

Viking Fourtech

76%

Viking WinTech

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

комфорт

Firestone Multiseason 2

71%

Viking WinTech

50%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

сухий

Firestone Multiseason 2

71%

Viking Fourtech

59%

Viking WinTech

63%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

сухе гальмування

Firestone Multiseason 2

68%

Viking Fourtech

47%

Viking WinTech

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

суха обробка

Firestone Multiseason 2

74%

Viking Fourtech

71%

Viking WinTech

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

розміри та ціни

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

порівняння: Firestone Multiseason 2 Проти. Viking Fourtech Проти. Viking WinTech Проти. Hankook Ventus Evo Проти. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Multiseason 2

Fourtech

WinTech

Ventus Evo

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

мокрий

сніг

витрати

комфорт

сухий

розміри та ціни

додати до порівняння