0 shops · 0+ products

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 (2026)

Test profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
6
10
Best position
#6
#2
Average position
9.8
6.0
Latest test
2018
2026
Available sizes
71
117

These tyres were not tested together. the comparison below is inferred from separate tests by normalizing both tyres against 6 shared benchmark tyres, so treat it as an estimate.

Dry
Confidence
Fulda EcoControl HP
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
100%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
100%
Wet
Confidence
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
94%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
100%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
100%
Comfort
Confidence
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
88%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
88%
Costs
Confidence
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Price/value
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Dimension Fulda EcoControl HP Kumho Ecsta HS52 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison