0 shops · 0+ products

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Firestone Roadhawk (2026)

Test profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Firestone
Roadhawk
Number of tests
6
21
Best position
#6
#2
Average position
9.8
11.9
Latest test
2018
2024
Available sizes
71
174

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Dry
Confidence
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Wet
Confidence
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
93%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
97%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
97%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
93%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Comfort
Confidence
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
40%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
40%
Costs
Confidence
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Price/value
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
68%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Dimension Fulda EcoControl HP Firestone Roadhawk %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
Mutual tests available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
літній
2018195/65 R15View
AutobildAutobild
літній
2018195/65 R15View
ADACADAC
літній
2018205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison