0 shops · 0+ products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Fulda EcoControl HP (2026)

Test profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Fulda
EcoControl HP
Number of tests
21
6
Best position
#2
#6
Average position
11.9
9.8
Latest test
2024
2018
Available sizes
174
71

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Dry
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Wet
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
97%
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
93%
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
97%
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
97%
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Fulda EcoControl HP
93%
Comfort
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
40%
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
40%
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Costs
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
68%
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Dimension Firestone Roadhawk Fulda EcoControl HP %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
Mutual tests available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
літній
2018195/65 R15View
AutobildAutobild
літній
2018195/65 R15View
ADACADAC
літній
2018205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison