0 магазини · 0+ продукти

порівняння: Continental UltraContact Проти. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Проти. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Проти. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Continental
UltraContact
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Кількість тестів
1
6
4
1
Best position
#7
#3
#2
#1
Average position
7.0
4.7
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2023
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
88
146
40
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокрий
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
гальмування на мокрій дорозі
Continental UltraContact
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
аквапланеризм - крос
Continental UltraContact
58%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
аквапланування - поздовжнє
Continental UltraContact
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
витрати
Continental UltraContact
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
пробіг
Continental UltraContact
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
комфорт
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
зовнішній шум
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
сухий
Continental UltraContact
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
сухе гальмування
Continental UltraContact
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

розміри та ціни

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

додати до порівняння

Popular brands
нове порівняння